Who said organic farming was for hippies?

By Joanna Wolstenholme

Organic farming seems to have earned itself a reputation amongst some in the scientific community for being unscientific and misguided. However, researchers at Rothamsted Research, in conjunction with the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) and the Kenya Ministry of Agriculturehave been doing their best to combat this image, and inject some innovation into the field.

In principle, there is not much to dislike about organic farminga reduction in chemicals used to grow our foods can only really be a good thing; even if there is no link between eating organic and having better health (a recent study showed that those who ate non-organic foods were no more likely to contract cancer). For instance, a reduction in the energy required to produce and spray pesticides and herbicides would go a long way to making agriculture more sustainable. In poor subsistence farming communities, such chemicals are far too expensive to even dream of buying, so a cheap and effective alternative has the potential to radically improve yields.


All Organic– Food for Thought (Album Cover)

Researchers at Rothamsted harnessed the power of compounds already produced by plants in their scheme for ‘Push-Pull’ companion planting, which has been implemented in West Africa, and produced great yield improvements. In this scheme, maize is protected from both the Stemborer moth ( considered the most important insect pest of maize at altitudes of 500m above sea level in sub-Saharan Africa)and the parasitic weed Striga, by the addition of a legume called Desmodium and a fodder plant,Napier grass, to the fields.

Desmodium is planted between the rows of maize, and produces volatile compounds to repel the Stemborer moth (the ‘push’ part of the system). It also produces compounds that induce Striga to germinate too early, before the maize has roots that are sufficiently developed for parasitism, and so the Striga dies off before it is able to establish itself. Additionally,as if this twin pest prevention wasn’t enough, Desmodium fixes much needed nitrogen into the soil and so also acts as a fertiliser. Napier grass (the ‘pull’ component), on the other hand, is planted at the edge of the crop, where is attracts the Stemborer moths to lay their eggs, yet prevents the Stemborer larvae from growing to adulthood. Furthermore, both Desmodium and Napier grass have value as fodder crops.

Napier Grass (Image Credit Forest & Kim Starr)

Napier Grass (Image Credit: Forest & Kim Starr)

This system has already proved effective in the field, with one family even saying that it increased their yields from just 5 bags of maize to 35! This means they are no longer reliant upon charity handouts, and have been able to use their profits to re-roof their house and send their son to school.

What is brilliant this about this effective system is its simplicity. Once a few families have been shown the benefits of such a system and seen the effect on their own yields, it is easy for them to teach others.In short, the movement becomes self-sustaining. Yet it is not only subsistence farmers that can benefit from such systems. We should be trying to integrate techniques such as these into our energy intensive Western farming techniques, in a bid to make them more sustainable. Organic farming may have been invented by hippies, but we all need it now.

For more information, and success stories: http://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/Content/index-Section=ForThePublic&Page=GoodCompanions.html

And for more information on the Stem Borer: http://maizedoctor.cimmyt.org/en/component/content/310?task=view





Tulips and TBV: The Curse of Beauty

By Nathan Smith

Think of a word to describe disease. Any number of negative adjectives may come to mind: painful, sorrowful, terrifying. But can a disease be beautiful?  Enter Tulip Breaking Virus (TBV), a disease of (unsurprisingly) tulips that causes colour-breaking in the plant’s flower. Colour-breaking is where the flower of the tulip displays more than one colour; for tulips, in a world free from disease, come only in solid colours.

Absalom tulip (Image Credit jpwbee)

Absalom tulip (Image Credit jpwbee)

In fact, TBV is one of five plant viruses that cause tulips to break this restriction, creating patterned petals in infinite combinations of streaks, stripes, feathers and flames. The cause of such wondrous symptoms is the irregular distribution of anthocyanin within the plant cells. Within TBV two strains are recognised, a severe and a moderate form. The severe form causes lack of anthocyanin leading to light breaking and the moderate form causing dark breaking due to excess anthocyanin.

The virus is historically important as being the cause of tulip mania, a period in Dutch history where tulip bulbs sold for increasingly high amounts. It was the rare bulbs affected by TBV that sold for the most, and at one point 12 acres of land were offered for one bulb of Semper Augustus, believed to be one of only two bulbs in existence at the time!

Infected tulips display other, less aesthetically pleasing symptoms too. Leaves become mottled and the bulb becomes increasingly stunted until it lacks the energy to flower and the bulb withers away or breaks apart. The unique beauty of these flowers is temporary, and after a brief flash of radiance their delicate splendour is lost to the annals of history. This is true for some of the most famous varieties, such as Semper Augustus or Viceroy, of which a single bulb sold for more than ten times the average craftsman’s annual earnings during the tulip mania.

Semper Augustus

Semper Augustus

Today, infected tulips still exist such as Absalon, which flowers a chocolate background with rich yellow swirls and has existed since at least 1780. However, to prevent spread of the virus many countries, including the UK, have placed a ban on the sale of “broken bulbs”.  For those still desperate to get their hands on patterned tulips, stable variants do exist that are the result of breeding and not of viral infection, such as Rem’s Sensation, though to many they do not match the spellbinding beauty of a flower doomed to die.

Socotra: A Plant Lover’s Paradise

By Toby McMaster

About 400 kilometres south of the Arabian Peninsula lies an group of islands like no other. Looking somewhat alien, it plays host to over 700 species of plant found nowhere else on the planet, leaving it only slightly behind Hawaii, the Galapagos islands and New Caledonia. Remarkably, it is less than half the size of even the latter coming in at 3,796 km^2  . Indeed, this isolated island possesses the most unique collection of plants on Earth per square metre.

Socotra Dragon Tree (Image Credit Boris Khvostichenko)

Socotra Dragon Tree (Image Credit Boris Khvostichenko)

Highlights of its distinctive flora include the ‘Dragon’s blood’ tree, which takes its name from its deep crimson sap. Today  it is used for any number of things, from a ‘cure-all’ medicine by the islands inhabitants, to dying wool and varnishing violins.

Then there’s the Dorstenia gigas, which could be described as a somewhat disfigured elephant leg. It is the largest Dorstenia species in the world, and a large part of what makes this unique landscape seem so extra-terrestrial.

Part of the islands’ charm lies in their mystery, their isolated nature means they have been relatively poorly studied, and, despite their obvious ecological uniqueness, they were only listed as a UNESCO world heritage site in 2008.

Bottle Tree, Socotra Island (Image Credit Rod Waddington)

Bottle Tree, Socotra Island (Image Credit Rod Waddington)

The islands’ isolation and unique environment has perhaps helped preserve its natural identity, having been abandoned as a Portuguese naval base in 1511 and by UK forces in 1834 after it was deemed unsuitable as a coaling station for ships headed to India.

Socotra is a world unique unto itself in almost every way and, if sustainably managed and conserved,  may yet yield new medicines and countless other useful chemicals. This alien world might one day bring us some benefits a little closer to home…

Plant factories: making organic pesticides?

By Tom Evans

In many peoples opinion, pesticides were one of the great tragedies of 20th century agriculture. They symbolized man’s dominance over nature: of the synthetic taming the organic – a cruelly ironic leitmotif of the modern world. In our post-Green Revolution era, most agricultural scientists see pesticides as anathema. Not only do they destroy the land and its biodiversity, but they also apply selection pressure onto insects to evolve resistant strains. The focal challenge of contemporary agriculture, then, is to devise new ways we can tame nature without inadvertently breeding resistance, or further damaging our precious ecosystems.

The bombyx mori silk moth

The bombyx mori silk moth

A recent paper in Nature Communications is part of a global effort to do just that. And, unsurprisingly, the answer comes through working with – not against – nature. A team of researchers from Kansas State University has genetically engineered a species of tobacco to produce chemicals known as pheromones. Plants do not usually make pheromones; in fact, they’re chemicals that insects produce, and they are usually involved in the communication systems of insects. For example, female silkmoths attract mates by producing a pheromone called bombykol. Male silkmoths can smell thispheromone from up to 10km away and follow the scent trail until they locate the female producing it.

So why has this group of scientists created a plant that makes pheromones?

The idea is we can harvest pheromones from plants and then use these natural chemicals in fields to control insects. At the moment industrially producing pesticides is bad for the environment, as well as the health of those working in pesticide factories. It’s also quite costly. By genetically engineering plants to synthesize pheromones, a so-called “plant factory” for pheromones could theoretically be established in the future, providing an environmentally friendly and cheap form of pest control. And moreover, the message is clear: nature is not our enemy, but our closest ally.

Methuselah, Pando and zombie-bacteria: Age records in the plant world

By Stephan Kamrad


Bristlecone Pine (Credit Dcrjsr)

Roughly 5,000 years ago, copper-made tools replaced ones made from polished stones, marking the transition from Neolithic to Bronze Age. 250 human generations were born and have died since then but this is also the sprouting day of the oldest tree still alive today: A great basin bristlecone pine (Pinus longaeva) growing in the White Mountains in California celebrated its 5063rd birthday this year!  The species grows in the subalpine regions of California, Nevada and Utah and is famous for its longevity.  Many old bristlecone pines grow in the White Mountains but the location of the most ancient ones is kept secret for their protection. One particular tree, Methuselah, was long thought to be the oldest tree, but it turns out it is only 4846 years old. A whole 217 years younger than the forest’s nameless elder, but still a lot older than its eponym: Methuselah, grandfather of Moses, who allegedly lived for 969 years.

The bristlecone pine’s secret is its resinous wood that is degraded only very slowly in the cold climate. Damaged, old parts of the bark and wood protect the still functioning parts and get worn away slowly by ice and wind. This makes age determination less than trivial because traditional ring-counting underestimates the age of the tree. Instead it involves a combination of methods such as cross dating, historic records and radiocarbon dating.


Quaking Aspen

However impressive this record as oldest individual tree may be, it is almost cute when compared to another plant living in the Fishlake National Forest in Utah. Pando (Latin for I spread) is a male quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides). The organism is 80,000 years old and weighs almost 6 million kilos.  It is a single plant with an underground root system spanning over 46 hectare (about half a square kilometres). From this root system a large number (over 40,000) trunks originate, but usually die after a few hundred years, being replaced by new trunks.

No animal comes even close to these ages. The oldest mammal is the bowhead whale. Tips of ancient harpoon weapons, now long out of use, found in whales and biochemical analysis determined that the whale was over 200 years old when captured. On a funny note, the method for determining the age of blue and fin whales involves counting the layers of wax in the whale’s inner ear; just like counting rings in a tree!


Bowhead Whale

The oldest terrestrial vertebrate known to us was Adwaita, an Aldabra tortoise who grew an estimated 255 years old. During the colonialisation of India, she belonged to the British general Robert Clive of the East India Company who kept her as a pet on his estate. Adwaita died in the zoo of Calcutta in 2006.

In the end, as it is so often in biology, the record is held by unicellular organisms. Recently, researcher found bacteria living in the sediment of the ocean that are millions of years old. Substrate is extremely scarce, putting them in a zombie-like state of barely detectable metabolic activity and cell division about once every 10,000 years (E. coli: 20 minutes).

For hunting records in biology, the same applies as for hunting records in sports: They are meant to be broken! Despite what the overwhelming amount of information on the internet may suggest, there are still many blanks on the map. Large areas of rainforest and desert were never set foot and are only known to us as satellite images and the deep sea is said to be less known than the surface of the moon. Who knows what we may find there.

Digitalis to Digitoxin

By Joanna Wolstenholme

The foxglove, it seems, is more than just a pretty flower. Now a wide stream drug – with the trade name of digoxin – used to treat congestive heart failure, it has been used in folk medicine since at least 1596.


Digitalis purpurea, or purple foxglove

Traditional herbals – compendiums of folk knowledge, accumulated and added to over the years and generations – are a mine of knowledge for possible new drug sources. William Withering, a forward thinking gentleman [s1] of the 18th century, understood this in a time when many dismissed such folk knowledge as witchcraft. He took a claim from John Gerard’s 1596 Herball that ‘Fox gloue boiled in water and wine…. Openeth also the stopping of the liver, spleene and milt and other inward parts’. This claim for the effects of the foxglove on the internal organs caught the curiosity of Withering, and he investigated further to find that foxglove was an effective cure for dropsy, a swelling of the limb and torso; a disease we now know is due to the inadequate pumping of the heart.

This use for foxglove was brought to the light after Withering’s conversations with a wise old woman in Shropshire, who had a family recipe for the cure of dropsy. Withering’s knowledge of herbs and the human body (he had training both as a doctor and a botanist, only truly becoming interested in botany after being asked to collect flowers for his sweetheart to paint) allowed him to isolate foxglove from the 20 odd herbs in the lady’s magic potion. He humbly commented later that it was ‘not very difficult for one conversant in such subjects, to perceive, that the active herb could be no other than foxglove’.

Withering went on to prescribe infusions of the leaves, and ground dried leaf powder, as a cure for dropsy. Modern reanalysis of the data that Withering recorded of his patients shows that he had a 65-80% success rate – good even by today’s standards. Powdered foxglove – now sold as Digitoxin, but still extracted from countless hundreds of foxgloves – is still prescribed to treat congestive heart failure, an underlying case of dropsy.

Stories such as these surely tell us that we cannot simply dismiss knowledge held in ancient herbals as nonsense, or witchcraft. Whilst those recording these cures may not have known how they work at the molecular level, nor conducted double blind trials, but they recorded potions and infusions that they knew to be successful. What worked then, in an age of ignorance of what caused terrifying ailments, will work now, in an age where we have the ability to extract the active compounds, and even synthesise analogues with fewer side effects.

Mathematical Patterns in Plants: Fibonacci and The Golden Ratio

By Ellie Archer

Spiral patterns abound in nature, manifesting themselves in plant petals, sunflower heads and pine cones. Remarkably, the maths behind these patterns all stems from one simple number: the golden ratio.

What is the golden ratio? Mathematically, it is the number ϕ such that ϕ = 1 + ϕ-1, approximately equal to 1.61803. Visually, if we draw a rectangle with sides in the ratio 1:ϕ, we obtain what is deemed to be the “perfect” rectangle (indeed Da Vinci used these rectangles to paint the perfect proportions for the Mona Lisa’s face). We can then construct a sequence of golden rectangles, as in the picture, inside of which we may inscribe the Fibonacci spiral, and it is precisely this spiral that we see exhibited so frequently in the natural world.



The Fibonacci Spiral (Image credit: people.rit.edu)

Perhaps the most classic example in nature is that of seed arrangement in a sunflower head. The seeds spiral out from the centre, and the problem is how to arrange the seeds to make the most efficient use of the space available. If you spiral too tightly, the seeds get squashed too close together and do not have sufficient space to mature. If you spiral too slowly, a lot of the space available isn’t utilised. It transpires that the most efficient path to take is a Fibonacci spiral.

Why is this? Imagine we are tracing a spiral by forming a seed, then rotating through a certain angle, then forming a new seed, and repeating. Suppose we make a quarter turn between forming each seed. We just end up with four straight lines of seeds, branching out from the centre in a cross shape. A similar thing occurs if we take any simple fraction (such as 5/7 or 1/31, giving seven or 31 branches respectively). Perhaps if we take an irrational number, say π, things may be better. But in actual fact π is very close to 22/7, so again we get seven branches, this time with very slight spiral behaviour.

ϕ is special because it is pretty much as far from a simple fraction as it could be.  Repeatedly applying the relation ϕ = 1 + ϕ-1, we can write it as the following infinite fraction:

This means that rotating through a fraction ϕ of a full turn avoids building up branches with empty space in between. Instead we get a pattern as shown in the sunflower, which is in fact a lot of Fibonacci spirals.


Fibonacci spirals in sunflowers (Image credit: brilliantbotany.com)

The golden ratio is deeply connected to the Fibonacci sequence (0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, …, where each term is formed by adding the previous two). Though the Fibonacci numbers were initially studied in relation to mating patterns in rabbits, it turns out that the ratio between two successive Fibonacci numbers is very close to ϕ, and indeed gets arbitrarily close as we take larger Fibonacci numbers. This means that the total number of spirals we see is usually a Fibonacci number, and if we count spirals going in opposite directions, we get two consecutive Fibonacci numbers, as shown in the pine cone below.


Fibonacci spirals in a pine cone. We count 13 and 8 spirals in each direction, both Fibonacci numbers. (Image credit: http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/hosted-sites/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibnat.html)

There are countless examples of this in the plant world. Not only does this explain why three-leafed clovers are far more abundant than their four-leafed counterparts, but next time you see a daisy, take a look: chances are it’ll have 21 petals!

Anything you can do, plants can do better!

By Stephanie French

The other week I bumped into a friend of mine in Sainsbury’s. We were chatting away as usual when he asked me: “are plants alive?”. I thought to myself that this was just another example of how under-appreciated the Plantae kingdom is, and yes, of course, most people do know that plants are alive, but many perceive them to be boring, simple lower-life organisms.

Credit: Atanu Saha

Credit: Atanu Saha

However, this is far from the truth; land plants actually evolved after animals, and in some ways are more complex. For example, while animals can move away from poor environments, plants are forced to cope with whatever nature throws their way. They may not appear to change very much in different weather conditions, but within plants hundreds of dynamic signalling events are occurring from the cellular to the whole-plant level allowing the plant to survive in extreme environments. For example, during high light-stress, plants can move chlorophyll within their cells to more “shaded” areas, rapidly move their leaves, develop surface reflectants (pubescence), and dissipate excess heat using the xanthophylls cycle…the list goes on. Plants, unlike animals, are actually acclimating throughout their entire life cycle.

Further complexity of the plant cell can be seen just by looking down a microscope, or thinking back to the classic ‘animal cell vs plant cell’ picture present in nearly all high school biology text-books. Plants contain more organelles including, of course, chloroplasts! And, sure, animal cells can differentiate to form more complex-looking cells such as nerve cells, but plant cells can do that too (e.g. sieve-tube elements). Also, although not generally realised by most people, plants can form organs like animals too – leaves and flowers etc. are indeed organs. Do you know any animals that have chloroplasts? I think not (ok actually there are actually three but they steal the chloroplasts from plants)

And if you thought your love life was complex, for plants it is (probably) even more so. As angiosperms (flowering plants) can produce multiple stamens (male-parts) and carpels (female-parts) there is so much more potential for variation. A single flower can be male or female or hermaphrodite. On the whole plant, all flowers may be the same sex or there may be a combination of male, female or hermaphrodite flowers. Plants even have a complex mechanism called self-incompatibility, to prevent inbreeding.

When sex does occur, it is twice as good as in the animal kingdom. Double fertilization occurs whereby one sperm cell penetrates the egg cell while another penetrates a different cell called the central cell. Both these cells develop within the seed, the former forming the embryo and the later forming the endosperm, which provides nutrients to the developing plant.

In fact plants are so complex and diverse that they even confused Charles Darwin! He frequently referred to angiosperms as an ‘abominable mystery’, as he could not figure out what the most ancestral flowering plants looked like or why they diverged so rapidly. This is still disputed over by many scientists! One theory is that by using other organisms to carry their gametes, angiosperms were able exploit many niches and diverge in a short space of time.

These are just a few of the many reasons why plants deserve so much more respect than they currently receive. So much research is focussed on animals, with the possibility that it may enable future drug discoveries, which of course is great. However, plants have the potential to increase crop productivity and provide the world with renewable energy, so research on plants is equally, if not more, important.

Job: Righteous Sufferer or Eco-Warrior?

By Tom Pryce

Approaching a stranger – with no particular Biblical expertise – on the street, asking what the Bible says concerning the natural world, one can anticipate the answer. Having been given the supreme position at the start of the canon, Genesis 1-3 comes to the forefront of their memory. It reminds them of God’s creation in 7 days and that terribly slippery notion of humanity’s ‘dominion’ over the planet. And yet – foregoing the heated debates regarding its place in ancient Israelite faith – creation plays a significant role elsewhere, in oft-neglected corners of the Hebrew Bible. Such passages offer a counter balance to the divinely ordained environmental exploitation committed under the banner of ‘dominion’. They provide a deeper understanding of what it really meant when God made humanity stewards over creation.


Léon Bonnat’s “Job”

The beautifully constructed divine speeches of Job 38-41 are one such text. After 37 chapters of bitter complaints from the righteous sufferer Job, God bursts onto the scene, speaking from the whirlwind. Belittling rhetorical questions challenge Job’s misguided presuppositions: it is God, not Job, who is the all-powerful, all-knowing Creator and carer for creation. Further, God’s role extends far beyond the individual cares and well-being of Job, or of humanity in general. God cares for the wild ass, beyond human control. God cares for where no humans inhabit, causing rain to fall in an otherwise barren desert. God cares even for the Leviathan, the great Biblical emblem of the chaos that constantly threatens the natural and social order; described by God as a play-mate in the oceans, what to humans is the destructive ‘other’ is to God a rubber duck in the bath.

These speeches are often interpreted as a heartless God, apathetic to Job’s misery, challenging the petty human’s anthropocentrism. I believe something much subtler is going on. In the existential crisis preserved in these passages, Job’s anthropocentrism is challenged, yes. But this induces a tragic sublimity in the fullest sense: with his self-understanding decentred, and his perceptions of the created order shown to be misguided, the rug has been pulled from beneath Job’s feet. God, however, does not do this in a cruel manner, revelling in Job’s suffering. Destroying the categories through which Job understands the world, God intends to elicit self-knowledge from Job. Challenging him to reach a fuller understanding of himself, the tragic sublime knocks Job down, so as to then elevate him to new insight. Job  is challenged by God to a new understanding of what it means to be a steward over creation. Being created in the God’s image, the description of divine providence serves as a reminder to Job of his responsibilities.


Julius Schnorr von Carosfeld’s “Creation (Day Seven)”

Job is forced to appreciate that ruling over creation does not mean, or even allow, the creation of a hedonistic paradise where all creatures – or at least humans – may have their inner-most desires perpetually satisfied. Instead, it requires care for all of the creatures which inhabit the earth, even if this care requires the self-sacrifice of some. Providence over creation requires that some creatures may suffer, to allow for the general well being of the created whole. This even requires that God allows the eagle prey on the fallen human soldier, so as to feed the young waiting in the nest. God challenges Job to appreciate the nature of divine providence. In doing so God elicits a new self-understanding of Job, who can recognize what his role as the imago deo truly requires of him.

If one were to ask Job – after his dialogue with God – what the Bible has to say about the natural world, I believe that the answer would be quite contrary to that of the stranger on the street. Rather than dominion, I believe the righteous Job would call for responsible stewardship over creation. I believe Job would recognize the value and care which humans, as stewards, should have for creation, even if this is sometimes to the detriment of their personal desires. I believe Job would understand the full sense of what the stewardship given by God to humanity in Genesis 1-3 really calls for.